DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
Docket No: NR11559-14
Z23 Aprii Z0LS
Dear Petty Officer
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code,
section 1552.
You requested removing the enlisted performance evaluation reports for
25 January to 15 March 2009 and 16 June to
20 July 2011.
It is noted that the Navy Personnel Command (
contested report for 25 January to 15 March 20098
BR three-member pane
sitting in executi
2OLS:. The names a
r
ad
oO
q W
o o
rr Ww
t
EE
Oo
cs
Oo
i
Q
furnished upon request. Your a@Lleqavione
reviewed in accordance with admirz and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Boara. umentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel
Command, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,
the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In
this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application for
corrective action beyond that effected by NPC has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11612 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by of your application, together with all : in support thereof, your naval record, and regulations, and policies record r personality n immaturi heroin, cocaine, amphetamine uana, a diethylamide (LSD). Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted to charige it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11960 14
BK Qa 20 w f the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your 1 2015. eae a ———— se eee New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11957 14
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is -on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6761 14
)¢ OR i z = ce Py Oo om Pe Hw YU Q) o 4 w cd Oop GQ i St) ~ 3 uO oO O oO Mm o ow Wi @ o iW Oo 1) Ow 3 wm o i @ oH oa rc Q oO wm @ Yo aoa G fx ag Ww o Ho o,nn oD SG wy 2 Hed & OV Qa Oo HS Qo44 Hi E 1 gm O Youn o oH U Ee “cl wv 1 ~ oH ow “ ou vO rd My oy ed ri} 3. 0Ort > WO © oO G am vo 4 ) + co Up ICel beca law ed as an ea r ena 15 4 provi Docket No. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5881 14
NAVY E DEPARTMENT OF TH a u r £ E 1 4 ‘ 4 i Go 4 Gb ne Bo 4H O ) { ‘ 4 1 Amini SAUL ii) p=) { Oa HOG YO py « n T wv a un) Oo im Oo ore O rp Oo @ on a 1 a a PA dd UO 4 vo cD ~ 2 oO OH S Q Vv G& Ox dh Pp ow OH id ume U2 crorde: oe Ny Rea rant Will comments ished 1 publ ns ulLatio ni er rTeTnd fit crewW1y re actly ad my ) memir a lectio Docket No. NR586i-14 who are retired are not eligible to transfer their education benefits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04437-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14
FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6742 14
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.